Local Immigration Advocates Say Hochul’s ICE Proposal Falls Short, Push for “New York for All” Act

New York Governor Kathy Hochul last Friday proposed legislation aimed at limiting local law enforcement’s cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Her proposal would ban counties and cities from entering into so-called 287(g) agreements, which allow local police to partner directly with federal immigration authorities.

But immigration advocates say the governor’s plan doesn’t go far enough. Many are calling on Hochul to pass the broader New York for All Act, which would prohibit state and local government agencies—including police—from assisting ICE in detaining or deporting immigrants.

“We’re very clear on our demand, which is the New York for All Act,” said Daniel Atonna, political coordinator for For the Many, a grassroots organization in New York’s Mid-Hudson Valley. “It would completely prohibit New York state and local government agencies, including police, from colluding with ICE, disclosing sensitive information, or diverting personnel or other resources to further federal immigration enforcement.”

Atonna, whose parents are immigrants, emphasized that the organization is also supporting the Melt Act, legislation that would unmask ICE operations across the state. “We’re really loud and clear about asking state legislators to co-sponsor New York for All and Melt and for Governor Hochul to pass them unamended before the state budget,” he said.

Critics argue that eliminating 287(g) agreements alone does little to stop ICE cooperation. A recent report from New York Focus highlighted a police chief in the village of Allegheny who said ending 287(g) agreements would not prevent his department from assisting ICE—it would only stop the department from being reimbursed for it.

“For the governor to ignore these bills that already exist and to propose her own watered-down, half measure is really frustrating and disappointing,” Atona said. “Unfortunately, it’s emblematic of a lot of the stuff Governor Hochul does, where she takes good ideas and then waters them down to please either corporate donors or conservative voters.”

In an interview on NPR’s Morning Edition, Hochul defended her proposal, calling it a “very positive step” while acknowledging that some immigration advocates say it doesn’t go far enough.

Atonna countered that the governor’s approach is actually slowing progress. “Governor Hochul is smart enough to know that if she were to get behind New York for All, it would immediately pass the State Assembly, where it’s been held up,” he said. “Her not supporting it and proposing this half measure is actually what is blocking New York for All from happening.”

Beyond state legislation, local concerns are growing. ICE has proposed building a detention center in Chester, Orange County, capable of holding up to 1,500 people. Advocates fear the facility could eventually house more than 2,000 detainees.

“People are really scared,” Atonna said. “This new proposal is almost unanimously opposed by people across the Hudson Valley. ICE is proposing building this, and we’re calling on Orange County and the state government to do everything they can to fight it.”

For advocates like Atonna, the fight goes beyond legislation. “The protest needs to continue. Grassroots advocacy needs to continue. Lobby meetings, calling your state legislators, meeting with them in person, talking about how important New York for All is,” he said. A major mobilization is planned for March 10 in Albany.

Image: A federal agent wears an Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge in New York, June 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura, File)