Alittle addition: For years the defendeders of "Climate Change" used to give as a support for their beliefs that "hotter air holds more water and this causes heavier rain and therefore 'extreme weather'."

I never paid much attention to thie particualr issue as the NOAA own data referenced in my previous comment show beyond any reasonable doubt that there has been no increase in ambient temperatures in Sullivan County, NY since the year 1985. (This may different in the Central Park in NYC as there was been a large increase in hot car exhaust fumes and the hot exhaust of aircoditining.

So I looked into the issue of air temperature, relative humidity of air and the amount of moisture in the air. It turns out the the author's clain in the article above is also false. It is like this:

1. Warmer air indeed holds more water
2. But the relative humidity of air goes down with higher air temperature
3. As the rain happens only when the relative humidity reaches 100%, it is obvious if the air temperature would go up, as falsely claimed by the author, for the same amount of moisture in the air the relative humidity of air would drop and IT WOULD RAIN LESS AND NOT MORE as also falsely claimed by the author.

Isn't the science a pesky thing?