Fallsburg residents voiced strong opposition to proposed zoning changes at a packed January 21 Town Board meeting. The amendments would allow higher housing density in agricultural zones, raising concerns about water, sewer infrastructure, and environmental impact.
Brett Budde, a Fallsburg resident and Majestic Farm owner, warned, “This summer, my well went dry. If we don’t address these issues, our homes will lose value.” Others echoed fears of overdevelopment, pointing to ongoing infrastructure struggles.
The changes stem from concerns that current zoning laws may violate the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), which protects religious institutions from restrictive zoning. While some residents, like Joel Brewer, argued the amendments correct past discrimination, opponents fear they will accelerate large-scale development.
Former councilmember Rebecca Pratt criticized the town’s handling of the hearing, urging an extended public comment period. Supervisor Michael Bensimon said the board would keep the hearing open until February 4 for further input. An additional public hearing is scheduled for February 4 at 6 p.m. at Fallsburg Town Hall.
With 13 active construction projects and 21 more under review, Fallsburg faces mounting pressure over land use. Environmental groups, including Catskill Mountainkeeper, warn of costly infrastructure upgrades, while residents like Pam Wagner argue the town must preserve its rural character.
Fallsburg has submitted the amendments for Sullivan County review and awaits further recommendations.
Photo by: Patricio Robayo
Overdevelopment of our town will lead to extra costs for current residents for new wells, garbage disposal, and more traffic. The rights of all residents to live the life they are looking for,in a rural non congested areas.a,should be respected, not just the rights of certain groups.